| 7 months ago :: May 07, 2009 - 3:13PM #1 | |
|
Im getting one for PSN and tried both demos, but I cant decide lol! Anynoe have any opnions on which one is better and why? I might like 1942 slightly better but I like commando aswell, which is the longer game? and which one had more replay?
Thanks. kevin. |
|
| 7 months ago :: May 07, 2009 - 4:07PM #2 | |
|
I haven't finished either game yet, so I don't know which is longer, but I prefer 1942 to Commando 3. The art style of C3 is kind of a turn-off, especially during the cut-scenes. 1942 is more of an HD update of the classic game and plays very well. Ultimately, I'd get both if I were you, but if you're going to choose one, make it 1942... |
|
| 7 months ago :: May 07, 2009 - 5:29PM #3 | |
|
I love both, but 1942 has the best difficulty curve that I've ever come across. It's stays perfectly challenging while never losing its fun. 1942!
XBL- BigApple3AM
|
|
| 7 months ago :: May 07, 2009 - 5:56PM #4 | |
|
I loved 1942, it's nice to hear about this game again, I agree with another 1942!
Death Cross Dancing Resurrected!
http://cryolegionaire.webs.com/ You are a stupid man's idiot!-Atomic Bomberman |
|
| 7 months ago :: May 07, 2009 - 6:12PM #5 | |
|
Awesome! I was leaning twards 1942, but I guess Its garenteed now.
Thanks guys. |
|
| 7 months ago :: May 10, 2009 - 8:33PM #6 | |
|
Commando 3. It goes back to Capcom's roots with the cartoony style, the animation is cool, the music couldn't be better, and the 3P multiplayer is a blast with friends! I have both, but Commando 3 was my #1 Game of the Year. The game is simply awesome, especially if you're a big fan of the old Mercs... |
|
| 7 months ago :: May 11, 2009 - 9:14AM #7 | |
|
I enjoyed both... but If only one i'd have to say 1942 |
|
| 7 months ago :: May 12, 2009 - 1:59AM #8 | |
|
Both really are fantastic. I hope you get the other one eventually!
XBL- BigApple3AM
|
|
| 7 months ago :: May 12, 2009 - 5:00PM #9 | |
|
C3 is good but 1942 is great. Would you rather do the 2 stick thing or press a fire button a million times? My button thumb is pretty broken in so I love shooters that make you hurt. Too many games these days rely on dual sticks in my opinion. |
|
| 7 months ago :: May 13, 2009 - 7:45AM #10 | |
|
I'd go with 1942. I liked both but 1942 is DEFINITELY the better of the two. It felt like it had more variety, a lotmore spit-and-polish than Commando 3("wait....were those the ONLY bosses in this whole game?!"), and the challenge keeps you on your feet. |
|
Capcom Games Discussion
Group Started:
06.04.08
Group Owner
Capcom A dmin
Moderators
|
1942 or Commando 3?
|
