Jun 29, 2009 -- 3:28PM, el_magnifico2702 wrote:

Jun 24, 2009 -- 1:50AM, mister negative wrote:

Jun 23, 2009 -- 5:56PM, el_magnifico2702 wrote:

i ve to disagree , in SFIV characters have only one supermove and u have to fill up 4 gauge 4 small damage at the end, its pretty much useless, characters shouldd have at least 2 supermer moves,, the commands are unprecised particularly those involving L1, and L2 buttons (ps3), its hell 2 excute the move u want at the right time, and the movie sequences suck, lol the game is not worth the money

so from what i seen,you critisise sf4 because it not like the alpha games...LOL

stop saying **** and get a life,you idiot

u can't denied dat the gameplay of street alpha 3 is better than Sf4's gameplay capcom has just been lazy on SF4, plus i was shocked when i learned that you have to pay 4 the alternate costumes,  the game is just decieving

I can deny it. I loved the Alpha games. They were the first fighting games I was pretty competitive in. I'm a lot worse at SFIV, but I'd never say SF4's gameplay is worse. To me, the less characters is a good thing. Less flash, more substance.

The Ultras are great in SFIV. You can't throw out a random ultra...it'll get you killed. However, a nicely set up ultra can lead to a beautiful comeback. The game is pretty balanced. I know there are tiers, but I feel like I have a chance even in the hardest matchup.

What really makes the game are the FA's...especially the FADCs. I'm not going to sit here and bash SFA3. It's one of my favorite games of all time, but to say it's better than SFIV? That's a matter of opinion...not a fact by any means.