Apr 30, 2009 -- 6:27AM, Rad wrote:

If you added new characters that would be a whole new game, so I'm going to say no to new characters. Now if they make the tournament balance PERFECT --> Improve to balance to the point where every character has equal chances of winning on the highest levels of play. This is all the game needs.

Now if Capcom ever decides to make a sequel to SF3: 3S? I will welcome new characters with open arms as long as they remember to apply the statement above to the new characters.

I would love to see what a (possible new FINAL BOSS) two-armed Oro could do! An older Sakura! Gouken not the (Broken) one from EGM! I can only imagine, but Dan with improved Saikyō-ryū and new moves! Not to mention Capcom's new roster of characters with different fighting styles! 

 

 

Not nessesarily, as long as it isn't like doubling the the roster or anything big like that. I'm just saying like one or two added characters would bealright.

Apr 30, 2009 -- 9:12PM, Rad wrote:

I guess if it's 1 or 2 characters why not. The 2 Characters in my opinion should be Gouken and the other Sagat, but I'm open to other characters as well.

To Capcom-Unity Peeps: What 2 characters would you include in a new Ver. of SF3: 3S? 

I'd add Sagat and Eagle to the game.

Any of the three options would make for awesome additions but I went with more characters. Why?  It would give people who didn't like the game for lack of their favorite character incentive to actually give the game a try. This give SF3 that extra bit it needs for the casual gamers.

New Characters: Balrog, Vega, Sagat, Bison, Cammy, Sakura, Gouken, Dan.

SF3 Anthology Final Cut: Rebalanced, Remastered and Restored.

Capcom would be Prime Steak if they did anything close to this and would get tons of respect.  A guy can dream.

2 words....

Dan    Hibiki

Sakura, Dan, Rufus... And Mike Haggar needs to be in a street fighter game and not just as a gief costume/clone