well yeah thats were my inexperience makes me look like a **** i suppose :D

this is the first SF ive really gotten into other than just messing around in arcades every so often

but either way. i think that honda's throw in particular just looks a little better with the cinematography/camera change

me I ****ing hate when the camera get all dramatic when they do a grab and/or ultra.I think they should take that off.

Oct 25, 2009 -- 6:20PM, Blastaar wrote:

meh, I agree with the OP, it does feel like a mini movie just interupted you in the middle an attack.

But it didn't.  His throw interrupted you.

People are acting like the camera is somehow getting in the way and making you mess up, but the fact is once the camera is doing its thing, you already ****ed up, and there's nothing you can do now anyway.

Why do people want to get rid of the coolest looking moves of he game (which look cool in main part because of the dynamic camera angle)?

Just because the gameplay has an old school feel to it doesn't mean the entire game has to be stuck in 1991.

The jump to polygons was a long, time consuming one...so it's time to reap the rewards!  Use those dramatic sweeps and zooms (during ultras and throws only).  Make the game sparkle to impress casuals (and me).

Why do people complain about things in SF4 which have been around in other fighting games for a decade?  Tekken, VF, Soul Calibur...the camera goes ape spit in those games, and no one cares.  If fact, people love it.  Yet, bring it to SF4 and people complain.  That double standard is starting to become a theme around here...

We know that the camera is not whats actually interupting us. What we're saying is that the sudden switch feels disconnecting. It's like I said, you could be throwing a sweep, watching your leg connect through his ankles, then suddently, the camera changes to you being grabbed. Or my favorit, he's kicking you, you block, then suddenly mini movie of him grabbing you.